Researchers
have long believed that micro-credit programmes - those in which women are
granted small, collateral-free loans for the purpose of starting
businesses - could increase women's empowerment and contraceptive use, and
reduce fertility.
But most attempts to document such benefits have been unable to
satisfactorily correct for selection bias: women who join the programs are
more likely than others to start out empowered - and are therefore more
likely than others to use contraception.
Between
1993 and 1995, Council demographer Sajeda Amin - along with Ruchira T
Naved of Save the Children U.S.A. and Fiona Steele of the London School of
Economics - evaluated a micro-credit program in rural Bangladesh.
To control for the problem of selection bias, they used a two-stage
process, surveying the women's attitudes, fertility, and level of
empowerment both before and after program membership.
Micro-credit
programs allow women to invest in income-generating projects.
Only the poorest women can join.
These schemes are intended to help women and their families work
their way out of poverty.
During 1995, roughly 3 million women in Bangladesh took small loans
from such programs.
Similar programs for extending collateral-free credit are being
replicated around the world, in both developing and industrialised
countries.
To
get a loan, women join financial groups that meet weekly.
The groups guarantee the loans.
The required weekly meetings provide opportunities for socialising
and sharing information.
Studies have shown that such gatherings can promote the spread of
novel behaviours and attitudes, such as using modern contraceptives or
wanting fewer children.
Furthermore, agencies administering the programs also provide
information on and access to modern contraceptives or wanting fewer
children.
Furthermore, agencies administering the programs also provide
information on and access to modern contraceptives.
Finally, because the programs improve the economic status of women
within their families and circulate cash into village economies, the
programs might also lead to fundamental changes in the status of women.
Amin
and her colleagues used data collected from women in 15 villages in
eastern Bangladesh.
A total of 4,333 poor, married women were interviewed twice.
The micro-credit program was implemented by Save the Children
U.S.A. and the Association for Social Advancement, a national credit
scheme.
As
they expected, the researchers saw notable evidence of self-selection.
Women who joined the groups were more likely than others to be
educated, married to educated men, and to have worked for money in the
past. But,
even after controlling for prior contraceptive use, the team found that
after two years of membership women in the program were 1.8 times more
likely to use contraception than were non members in the same village.
There was evidence of diffusion in the use of contraception.
Non-members in program villages were much more likely to use
contraceptives than were poor women in villages that did not have
programs.
Somewhat
surprisingly, although program members were more likely than non-members
to use contraceptives, the women in the two groups had the same
probability of becoming pregnant during the study.
The researchers speculated than an impact on pregnancy rates may
require a longer period of time and may take effect with some lag after
contraceptive behaviour changes.
The
researchers also surveyed women about their aspirations for their
children's education and found that members of micro-credit programs
reported the largest increase in the ideal number of years of education
for their daughters.
However, "the
aspirations for sons also rise.
The gender gap doesn't change"
Amin commented.
The
team's research as a whole points to the conclusion that use of
contraception is one of the first behaviours to change after the inception
of a micro-credit program, even when there is no evidence of more
fundamental change in the desire for children.
The fact that membership is associated with changed contraceptive
behaviour while, as other studies have shown, the amount of credit given
is not, suggests a role for the diffusion of information and behaviours
through membership.
The group meetings required by the programs, rather than the amount
of money provided by them, may be a significant mechanism for changes
relevant to fertility behaviour.
"Forming
groups for women to meet regularly, discuss new ideas, and share
information may be a potent factor in bringing about broad-based social
change, especially in a setting like Bangladesh where women are otherwise
isolated. These groups are an essential part of the social
transformation brought about by micro-credit initiatives, yet most studies
pay scant attention to what happens in their meetings,"
Amin argues. The researchers concluded that future research should
focus on social interactions among group members and between members and
non members, and on the role of these interactions in bringing about
social change.
|